Category Archives: General

Bill Cosby and the Jews

BillCosbyface_zpsdc06c96f[1]I must admit Bill Cosby has been my favorite TV comedian for all times. He is the only American comedian whose shows never made me ashamed while watching with my family. The latest fuss over his sexual behavior in the Jewish-controlled Hollywood and media, has not changed my opinion of Bill Cosby’s acting talent. His private life is not my concern – and it should not concern of the sex obsessed Zionist crowd either. Even if the “rape” charges against Bill Cosby are true - it’s norm in the Judeo-Christian culture.

Despite uproar over allegations that Bill Cosby had molested or assaulted several women in the past, 77-year-old comedian received a standing ovation at the end of his 90-minute, all sold-out performance at the campus of Eastern Florida State College on Friday,” reported The Jew York Times on November 22, 2014.

Comedian Sarah Silverman tweeted on Wednesday (Ha’aretz, November 21): “Bill Cosby gave me one of those ‘don’t be dirty’ lectures but I was unconscious & he was talking about my a-hole.”

Among the “rape” victims, is Jewish actress and publicist Joan Tarshis, 66, who has accused Bill Cosby for forcing her to perform oral sex twice when she was 19. One wonders why she kept her mouth shut when Cosby was surrounded and admired by Hollywood and Jewish TV stars like Jon Stewart. On Tuesday, Don Lemon at CNN asked her a similar question: why she didn’t use her teeth to avoid performing forced oral sex.

Is it the “rape” or Bill Cosby’s wealth which has brought so many skeletons out of his closet? In case you don’t know – Bill Cosby is the second richest Black actor in the world - worth over $350 million. Bill and Camille Cosby have loaned 62 pieces from their extraordinary art collection to the Smithsonian National Museum of African Art in Washington, D.C.

It’s just possible that Joan Tarshis is trying to get some publicity like her Jewish sister Monica Lewinsky, who became a millionaire by writing stories about her and Bill Clinton’s dirty laundry at the White House. Bill Cosby, no doubt, is richer and more famous than Bill Clinton.

Bill Crosby fell from Jewish Lobby’s grace last year when he told Stacy Brown of the New York Post (June 9, 2013) that Americans should follow the example set by the Nation of Islam in improving the moral and social values among Afro-American communities.

I’m a Christian. But Muslims are misunderstood. Intentionally misunderstood. We should all be more like them. They make sense especially with their children. There is no other group like the Black Muslims, who put so much effort into teaching children the right things, they don’t smoke, they don’t drink or overindulge in alcohol, they protect their women, they command respect. And what these other people do?

The complain about them. They criticize them. We would be a better world if we emulated them. we don’t have to become Black Muslims, but we can embrace the things that work. We need people not only in the church, but in the community, who are not afraid to speak up because they want to hear a child’s laughter – not a child’s blood-curdling scream because a bullet hit them. We want them playing outside,” Said Bill Cosby.

In case you don’t know how much the organized Jewry hate the Nation of Islam – read here, here, here and here.

Manuel Noriega: Israel’s forgotten ally

In July 2014, Panama’s former military dictator Gen. Manuel A. Noriega, 80,  serving jail in Panama, sued the Jewish-owned Activision Blizzard, the producer of the children terrorist game, The Call of Duty, which had used Noriega’s images as a brutal soldier and head of a drug mafia. He is seeking lost profits and damages in tens of millions from Activism Blizzard. Noriega lawyers argued that Activision had violated a section of California’s civil code that calls for anyone “who knowingly uses another person’s name, voice, signature, photograph or likeliness in any manner, in or on products, merchandise or purpose of advertising or selling, and does so without permission, is liable for damages sustained by the individual.”

In September, judge William F. Fahey, on request from Activision Blizzard, dismissed Noriega’s petition on the ground that it violated both the First Amendment and a free speech section of the California Constitution.

I bet the idiot wouldn’t have quoted the “free speech section” had someone questioned the Holocaust myth.

As in the past, during the US invasion of a sovereign state of Panama and arrest of its president Manuel Noriega in December 1989, none of the Zionist-controlled media reported the real dark-side of Noriega. He was a close ally of the Zionist entity in both military and drug warfare. A US kangaroo court found him guilty of international drug trafficking and sentenced him to 40 year in jail.

According to Richard H. Curtis (died 2013), both Uganda’s Idi Amin and Manuel Noriega were received their military training in Israel.

Noriega had gone military and intelligence training in Israel, jumped five times with Israeli paratroopers, and like Uganda’s deposed dictator Idi Amin – proudly wore his Israeli paratrooper wing on his uniform for many years afterward. Although critics say America bought and paid for Noriega, he was also an Israeli creation and a great admirer of the ruthless Israeli way, as was Idi Amin,” wrote Curtis.

Michael Harari (died 2014) former Mossad top hit-man trained Noriega’s special forces. He visited Israel, Nicaragua and Cuba in a bid to prepare a route to smuggle Noriega out of the country before US invasion. However, it seems his efforts were sabotaged by Israel’s crime syndicate. Harari played a key-role in Panama-based triangle that helped put drugs from Columbia into United States, used the proceeds to buy arms and sell it pro-Israel regimes and anti-government terrorists in Latin America, Africa and the Middle East.

No wonder Israel has become world’s top name in international drug trafficking. Interestingly, Israeli military leaders trained both Noriega and Idi Amin’s bodyguards.

Hollywood’s Holocaust promoter, Steven Spielberg, even produced movie Munich (2005) to glorify Harari. Moshe Ivgy played Harari’s character in the movie, which was based on one of Mossad’s false flag operations.

Read Richard Curtis’ investigative article here.

Jew scholar blames Christians for the US invasion of Iraq

US is using its own ISIS terrorists as an excuse to reoccupy Iraq to protect Israeli interests as it used Iraqi WMDs lies to invade and occupy Iraq in 2003.

With Iraq no threat, why invade a sovereign country? The answer: President Bush’s policy to secure Israel. Led by Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle and Charles Krauthammer, for years there had been a domino school of thought that the way to guarantee Israel’s security is to spread democracy in the area,” Sen. Ernest Holdings from South Carolina (1966-2004) said in May 2004.

Ironically, two American Jewish scholars, Noam Chomsky and Marianne Williamson have admitted that Israel is not a democracy, and United States fears democratic Muslim nations.

Having said that, I return to the topic of this post. Jacob G. Hornberger (Jewish) is an American academic, Lawyer and founder-president of the Future of Freedom Foundation. On November 14 he posted his views, entitled American Christians erect an Idol on US-UK invasion of Iraq in 2003.

The unconditional praise and thanks that American Christians give to the troops, who serve as the agents by which the national-security state violently imposes its will on others around the world. In offering such praise and thanks, there is never an independent judgment on whether what the troops are doing is good or bad. The American Christian automatically assumes that whatever the troops are doing is good and whoever they’re doing it to is a “bad guy“,” Hornberger.

What if the troops are actually engaged in conduct that violates God’s laws? That question never enters the mind of most American Christians, including Christian ministers. American troops are American men and women. They’re serving our nation. They’re defending our rights and freedoms. They’re our friends and neighbors. They attend church services with us. They’re on our team. Everything the troops do, the American Christian mindset holds, is automatically consistent with God’s laws. After all, don’t forget: The troops are Americans!,” adds Hornberger.

We witnessed this phenomenon especially in Iraq. Here was a war in which the U.S. government was clearly the aggressor nation and Iraq was the defending nation. Yet, many American Christians automatically came to the support of the troops, cheering for them, praising them, exalting them. It didn’t make any difference that the U.S. government was aggressing against people who had never attacked the United States. Once the invasion was underway, American Christians declared that the time for debate and discussion was over. It was our team — our men and women — who needed our support. The Iraqis had no right, American Christians said, to defend their nation against the United States. Those Iraqi citizens who chose to oppose the troops were automatically considered “bad guys” who deserved to die at the hands of the troops,” said Hornberger.

It was not much different with respect to Afghanistan. American Christians unconditionally supported the troops there as well, notwithstanding the fact that most of the people whom the troops were killing had nothing to do with 9/11. In fact, many of the Afghan people who were killed were doing nothing more than resisting the foreign invasion and occupation of their country, something that many people around the world would do in the face of a foreign invasion and occupation of their country,” adds Hornberger.

Many American Christians rationalized their support of the troops in Afghanistan by convincing themselves that the Afghan Taliban government had conspired with al-Qaeda to commit the 9/11 attacks. The truth is that the only reason President Bush sent the troops into war against the Afghan government was because the Afghan government refused to comply with Bush’s unconditional extradition demand for Osama bin Laden. There was no extradition agreement between the United States and Afghanistan,” said Hornberger.

Hornberger is not that far away from the truth. Christians which make majority of America’s 305 million population are responsible for their criminal government for keep electing politicians, who are nothing but Israeli donkeys.

Rosewater: Another anti-Iran propaganda movie

Listen, Jews do lot of things out of guilt. Generally it has to do with visiting people, not making movies,” Jon Stewart told the Jew York Magazine last month.

Jon Stewart (née Jonathan Stuart Leibovitz), the host of popular satirical The Daily Show, is director of the latest anti-Iran propaganda movie, Rosewater, which is scheduled to be screened this weekend at several cinemas in Toronto, Canada.

The movie is based on the so-called “autobiography” of Iran-Canadian journalist, Maziar Bahari, who was arrested in Iran covering Dr. Ahmadinejad’s re-election in June 2009 for the Jewish-owned Newsweek magazine. Bahari family left Iran after the fall of pro-USrael Reza Shah regime in 1979, as did millions of other secularist Iranian elites and Jews.

Bahari along with several other foreign “journalists” and election “monitors” were arrested in June 2009 on charges of being foreign agents involved in a violent pro-West regime change (Velvet revolution) in Tehran to destroy the foundations of the 1979 Islamic Revolution. Bahari who is married to Italian-British Jewish lawyer Paola Gourley, was released on October 17, 2009 to see his first-born baby in London.

Several of “journalists” arrested admitted that their trips were funded by the Open Society Institute and the Soros Foundations Network (OSI), The Rockefeller Institute, the Ford Foundation, the German Marshall Fund, Freedom House, Council on Foreign Relations, German Association for Foreign Policy, and the Institute for Democratic Studies in England, all controlled by Zionist Jews.

One of the anti-government Green Revolution leaders also admitted that he visited Israel where he was introduced to MEMERI officials. The founder of the group is a retired Israeli military officer. Its job is to mistranslate Muslim leaders statements in Arabic, Persian, Urdu, etc. into English to created western hatred toward Muslim countries. Former Iranian president Dr. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was the top target of MEMRI, when he was misquoted in October 2005 for saying Wipe Israel off the map. Since then, the quote has become part of the Zionist Talmud.

According to Jewish Moment magazine (July-August 2011), Mazair Bahari was “always fascinated by Jewish history and culture. He was the first Muslim who made a movie about Holocaust. His pregnant wife Paola Gourley led a campaign for his release which was latter joined by Israel-First Hilary Clinton, Stephen Harper and Jon Stewart.

The Zionist-controlled western leaders and mass-media called Ahmadinejad’s victory in 2009 fraud election even though he secured 62% votes while the western pundits have projected Ahmadinejad’s victory by 65% votes. The latest West’s ‘fraud elections’ have been re-elections of Russia’s Vladmir Putin and Syria’s Bashar al-Assad – but Ukrainian election was declared by the same leaders and media “kosher” because country’s Jew mafia won it.

Last year, Hollywood Hoax ARGO won top awards for running anti-Iran propaganda. Ben Afleck (Jewish) who directed the film for Jewish Warner Brothers and also played the leading role of Tony Mandez, tried to give credit to CIA agents for the rescue of some of the 52 American took hostages in US Embassy in Tehran by Iranian students. The story is debunked by Canadian professor an author Robert Wright (Trent University) in his book, ‘Our Man in Tehran’ claiming that it was Canada’s ambassador Kenneth Taylor, CIA Station Chief in Iran, who helped six US hostages to escape Iran with forged Canadian passports. Read more here.

The movie is primarily a propaganda tool aimed at Americans to sustain their fear of Iran,” said Danny Schechter, an independent Jewish filmmaker and blogger based in South Africa.

Soraya Sephapour-Ulrich, is an Iranian-born western-educated independent US investigative journalist focused on US foreign policy in the Middle East and the pro-Israel lobby groups in United States. She has just returned from Iran after a two-month-long fact-finding mission especially women treatment under the Islamic rule in that horrible “terrorist-sponsoring” nation against Israel and the West.

Western media with help from feminists and Iranians living outside of Iran portray Iranian women as being “oppressed” – foremost because women in Iran have to abide by an Islamic dress code – hijab. Yes, hijab is mandatory and women choose to either wear either a chador or to wear a scarf. But what is crucial to understand is the role chador played in pre 1979 versus the post Revolution era,” says Soraya who is neither religious or wears hijab.

She claims that before the 1979 Islamic Revolution, women wearing hijab were considered backward and second-class citizen with no opportunities at government, banking and education sectors. However, it has all changed since 1979.

Today’s Iranian woman, the same (formerly) less privileged class, has found freedom in her chador. She has been unshackled and she marches on alongside her (formerly) more privileged colleague. This emancipation is what the Western/Westernized feminists see as oppression,” she said.

I myself come from yesterday’s tiny minority of privileged women, far too comfortable in my Western skin to want to promote hijab, but I will not allow my personal preferences to diminish the value of the progress made because of hijab. The bleeding hearts from without should simply change their tainted lenses instead of trying to change the lives of others for Iranian women do not need to be rescued, they do not follow – they lead,” she admitted.

Soraya Sephapour-Ulrich had a rare interview with Iran’s former president Ahmadinejad. In 2010, Soraya interviewed US media “darling” Katie Kouric (born to a Jewish mother Elinor Tullie) of CBS, NCB and ABC, etc. During the interview, Kouric told Soraya that Israeli prime minister is the boss and US president Barack Obama is irrelevant.

Canada’s ‘Remembrance Day’: Myth and Truth

image034[1]The pro-Israel Stephen Harper government plans to celebrate Canada’s Remembrance Day on November 11 with a big bang. A majority of brainwashed Canadians, as usual, will honor all those fellow Canadian soldiers who sacrificed their lives, not to defend Canada, but to defend British colonial power against Germany and its allies in two World Wars.

I bet most Canadian never heard of Benjamin Freedman, historian and Jewish defector, who in a 1961 speech at the Willard Hotel had claimed that both WW I and WW II were fought for Jewish interests. The defeat of Turkish Ottoman Caliphate opened doors for the anti-Muslim British and French colonists to occupy Palestine, Al-Sham (Syria) and rest of Arab Middle East. This was Theodor Herzl’s dream come true. After WW II, without firing a single shot, the European Zionist Jews were rewarded with 56% of historic Palestine by the US, Russia and Britain.

Canada joined WW I on shameless propaganda of defending our freedom right while denying the same freedom rights to Germany and its allies. It joined WW II on the hypocrisy to save Jews from Nazis while refusing to accept Jew refugees from European nations.

Nothing much has changed in Ottawa’s war policy, only the masters have changed from London to Washington-Tel Aviv. It joined US-NATO led war in Afghanistan, the far-away Muslim nation which never threatened Canada. Last month, Canadian-CIA-Mossad, engineered Muslim terror in Ottawa and Quebec in order to make an excuse in joining the US-lead “coalition of absurd” to attack pro-Iran Syrian and Iraqi forces.

On November 8, Brandon Martinez, an independent Canadian journalist who specializes on Canada’s foreign policy toward Israel and rest of Middle East, posted an article, entitled, Canada’s ‘Remembrance Day’: righteous or rancorous, saying: “The fact is that Canada was not attacked in World War I or II. Positioned between two gigantic oceans, Canada is relatively safe geographically from foreign invasion and therefore had no real incentive to fight in either war. So why did Canada fight?”

And what was Britain’s reasoning for going to war the second time around? The brainwashed masses will say that “Nazism” was a grave and pressing danger and had to be stopped. But only if one is viewing the world through British or Jewish spectacles does that suggestion have any merit. As far as much of the global East and South were concerned, British imperialism was a far greater threat than anything posed by Hitler’s regional ambitions. From the perspective of the Arabs of Palestine and the Middle East, Jewish Zionism and its British imperial patrons was a worse adversary than Hitler’s Germany by a long shot. Germans were not the ones brutally occupying and suppressing the people of Palestine for the past two decades leading up to WWII, it was the English (and later the Zionist Jews),” Martinez said.

Neither WWI nor WWII were “good” or “just” wars by any stretch of the imagination. On the contrary, they were both catastrophic blunders that set the whole of Europe and Asia as well as parts of the Middle East and North Africa ablaze. The Second World War in particular delivered the world into the hands of the Anglo-American-Zionist Empire, thereby sealing the eternal fate of humanity as drone-like economic cogs and geopolitical cannon fodder for American, British and Jewish interests,” added Martinez.

BJP leader: Nehru was a traitor

On October 17, 2014, Kerala-based Hindutva newspaper Kesari published an article written by prime minister Modi’s BJP candidate during the state parliament election, B. Gopalakrishnan, who claimed that Gandhi’s assassin Nathuram Gondse should have killed Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru (Chacha Nehru), India’s first prime minister for being a traitor to Hindu cause.

In the article, Gopalkrishnan also blamed Nehru for accepting the partition of British into Hindu-majority India and Muslim-majority Pakistan.

Nehru’s selfish politics was behind national tragedies such as Partition and Gandhi assassination. After evaluating Nathuram Godse’s arguments in the light of historical documents related to Partition, if students of history feel Godse aimed at the wrong target, they cannot be blamed. Nehru was solely responsible for Partition of the country,” Gopalkrishnan said.

In May this year, Indian prime minister Modi and his cabinet ministers honored Gandhi’s assassin Gondse.

The controversial article was publish ahead of Modi’s government plan to celebrate Nehru’s 125th birthday on November 14. Nehru (born 1889) died of heart attack on May 27, 1964. The schools will be closed between November 14 to November 19. However, Nehru’s family members, Sonia Gandhi, president of Congress Party and her son Rahul Gandhi, opposition leader, her son-in-law Robert Vadra, a businessman are not invited to join Modi’s official birthday party in New Delhi.

The extremist Hindu leaders never liked Nehru for his western life-style and criticism of Hindu religion in certain ways. For example, in his book, The Discovery of India, he wrote on page 37: “Hinduism, as a faith is vague, amorphous, many sided, all things to all men. It is hardly possible to define it, or indeed to say definitely whether it is a religion or not, in the usual sense of the word. In its present form, and even in the past, it embraces many beliefs and practices, from the highest to the lowest, often opposed to or contradicting each other.”

Nehru in the same book testified that Islam spread peacefully for 300 years in India before the Afghan ruler Mahmud Ghaznavi established his ruler in some parts of India. He said that numerous Hindus served in Muslim courts and army, and many Muslim kings had Hindu Queens. Read more here.

Strangely enough, when Nehru’s only daughter Indira Nehru decided to marry a Parsi boyfriend Feroze Jahangir Gandhi (no relation to Mahtma Gandhi)from Oxford in 1942, Nehru disapproved her marriage with a non-Hindu person.

If one study the last days of British history from an objective source, he will find that both Gandhi and Nehru and many other leaders of Indian National Congress including two Muslim presidents of the party, Muhammad Ali Jinnah (later Father of Pakistan) and Sir Agha Khan, spiritual leader of Ismaili (Fatimid) Shia community, were against the partition of India. However, both Jinnah and Khan left Congress after realizing that party’s leadership was not interested in giving equal political, social and religious rights to non-Hindu minorities especially Muslims whose ancestors ruled Indian sub-continent for more than 1,000 years before the arrival of British and French colonialists.

The credit for the partition of India goes to Jinnah who as president of Indian Muslim League insisted on the partition of India into two states; Pakistan and India. Indian author Jaswant Singh in 2010 book, Jinnah: India-Partition-Independence, blames Hindu extremist leaders for forcing Jinnah to wage a campaign for an independent Muslim state carved out of British India.

Indian-born American writer, author and blogger, Dr. Susmit Kumar PhD, claims that Adolf Hitler and not Gandhi played a major role in the Independence of India.

One thing is for sure – Nehru like Gandhi was not a hypocrite. Born into a wealthy political active family, Nehru never pretended to be a religious person as Gandhi did. Gandhi was a lawyer who never studied Hindu religion while living in England and later practicing law in South Africa. In South Africa, Gandhi even allegedly maintained sexual relation with German Jewish bodybuilder. On his arrival in India from South Africa, the Congress leaders turned Gandhi into a Hindu Saint to fool the masses.

Both Gandhi and Nehru were known for their extra-marital relations. Gandhi kept company of young Hindu women while Nehru had open love affair with Edwina, wife of Lord Mountbatten, the British Viceroy of India. Both Nehru and Mountbatten exploited the ‘love triangle’ for their own political gains. (See photo below.

Special relationship: Lord and Lady Mountbatten with Indian Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru

Obama, Netanyahu and the ‘truth Serum’

Last week, Jeffrey Goldberg called Netanyahu chichenshit at the US newspaper Atlantic. Now, Israeli news website (+972) has reported that FBI found traces of sodium thiopental, also known as ‘truth serum’, in the White House, which could have affected Goldberg’s brain.

It seems the ‘truth serum’, like the Ebola virus has affected several powerful individuals in both United States and the Zionist entity.

On Saturday, US billionaire Donald Trump with Jewish family roots, accused Barack Obama being the greatest enemy of Israel among country’s presidents. Trump said that Obama hates Netanyahu and Israel while support Israel’s enemies like Syria, Iran and “jihadi groups”. He also claimed that Iran will have a nuclear bomb by next year. Trump was talking to Fox News host judge Jeanine Ferris Pirro (Jewish). In an earlier interview, Trump had called Obama , a “psycho”.

Earlier this week, a group of 106 retired Israeli military generals, directors of Israeli Mossad and commissioners of internal security agencies signed a letter to the Zionist prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu urging him to wake-up to the realities on ground and accept the Saudi proposed (2002)  two-state solution for the survival of the so-called Jewish state.

During an interview with Israel’s Mako-Channel 2 News, some of the Generals accused Netanyahu being “political blind”, who is only interested in his political survival. They said, the current turmoil in the Arab world is the golden chance to negotiate a deal with Palestinian Authority (PA) under Mahmoud Abbas. They also claimed that a Palestinian state would never pose a security threat to Israel due to latter’s military strength backed by Israel’s powerful western allies.

We’re on a steep slope toward an increasingly polarized society and moral decline, due to the need to keep millions of people under occupation on claims that are presented as security-related,” reserve Major General Eyal Ben-Reuven told Mako’s Roni Daniel. “I have no doubt that the prime minister seeks Israel’s welfare, but I think he suffers from some sort of political blindness that drives him to scare himself and us.”