Category Archives: Contemporary religions

MP: Christians are ‘mocked and belittled’ in Canada

harperandIsrael-4[1]Vancouver Island MP James Lunney believes that. He has resigned from the ruling Tory party as result of prime minister Stephen Harper’s knee-jerk pro-Jewish policies. He has decided to sit as an independent MP to speak more freely about his faith in Jesus Christ perspective instead of distorted Jesus’ message like the Christian Zionists.

I am tired of seeing my faith community mocked and belittled. To not respond is to validate my accusers and worse yet, imply that I lack the courage of my convictions to stand – up for what I believe. This is not a legacy I wish to leave behind,” wrote Lunney at his official website.

Lunney, has long claimed that he doesn’t believe in the Darwin (evolution) theory because it’s against Bible. In fact, both Torah and Holy Qur’an also reject the so-called “evolution theory”.

Several Jewish media outlets slammed Lunney’s decision to quit Tory party considering his ‘love’ for Israel. Lunney made three trips to Israel fully paid by the Jewish lobby groups.

Canada’s Fatima Center is the most hated Catholic denomination by the Organized Jewry for its biblical belief that Jews killed Lord Christ and have polluted the true message of Jesus. In August 2013, Harper’s defense minister Rob Nicholson refused Fatima Center’s invitation to be one of the keynote speakers at its A Path to Peace conference, calling the group ‘antisemite’.

Who controls Harper’s government while Canadian Constitution calls for the freedom of religion for all Canadian citizens including country’s largest non-Christian one million Muslim community?

In January 2014, a Vancouver Sun staff blog noted that on Harper’s recent trip to Israel, “ten influential evangelical Protestant pastors and leaders” (including the president of Christian & Missionary Alliance Canada) flew with him, along with 21 rabbis, but “no mainline Protestant leaders” and only one Catholic clergyman (a columnist for the Muslim-hating National Post) but no Islamic cleric were invited. The piece explained that “more than 60 per cent of the Canadian population is either mainline Protestant or Catholic,” while “evangelicals make up about 10 per cent of all Canadian voters.” The piece connected the trip to the Evangelical belief that current conflicts involving Israel and Palestinian fulfill Biblical prophecy.

Harper’s Islamophobia is the result of advice he receives from the Fraser Institute, an Israeli advocacy group named after Simon Fraser, a Zionist Jew.

Those who pay attention to what politicians say are familiar with the ambiguous way many of them prefer to speak on certain issues. That might be why it’s almost refreshing to hear the unrestrained racism coming out of Harper Conservatives these days, most of which is directed at Canada’s Muslim population,” S. Zhou said on March 25, 2015.

Good Friday and the Jews

O’G-d make Christians, Muslims, Buddhists, and Hindus to abandon their religions and accept the Torah of Israel,”Jewish High Holy Day prayer.

Canadian Catholics and members of several other Christian denominations will be celebrating Good Friday on April 3, 2015, which is a national holiday except in Quebec province.

Good Friday is the day when Christians commemorate the death of their Lord Christ on the Cross – an accursed death for an imposter and liar in the Jewish Bible, The Old Testament. However, Cross has been one of major pillars of Christianity since 325 CE, when Roman King St. Constantine (died 337 CE) declared Christianity as state religion.

Organized Jewry (ADL, AJC, B’nai B’rith, World Jewish Congress and several other pro-Israel Jewish organizations) lead by Abraham Foxman have been fighting against the Good Friday Prayer for decades. In 2008, ex-Pope Benedict XVI, an anti-Islam Zionist Christian, altered the prayers to please the Jewish Lobby. However, Foxman was not happy. He said: “We are deeply troubled and disappointed that the framework and intention to petition God for Jews to accept Jesus as Lord was kept intact.” Foxman went on to hold himself out as an expert in Catholic theology, saying the revised prayer “is a major departure from the teachings and actions of Pope Paul VI, Pope John Paul II, and numerous authoritative Catholic documents, including Nostra Aetate.”

Some Christian scholars interpreted Benedict XVI’s alteration as being calling Christ a liar.

Last month, Teachers’ Union sued management of Cranston Public Schools in Rhode Island on behalf of 200 teachers and employees for not allowed to take holiday on Good Friday this year.

Rabbi Bruce Kadden of Temple Beth El in Tacoma, Washington, is an author and involved in Jewish-Christian interfaith dialogues. He explains the difference between the two Jewish religions for the Jews and Christians to understand.

The primary theological difference between Judaism and Christianity centers on the interpretation of the life and death of a first century Jew, Jesus of Nazareth. Christians believe that Jesus is the Christ, i.e., the Messiah who is spoken about in the Hebrew scriptures, that he died to atone for the sins of human beings, that he rose again and is present in the life of those who invite him in. For Christians, Jesus is the Son of God who represents all truth about God. Jews do not believe that Jesus was the Messiah spoken about in the Hebrew scriptures because he did not free the first century Jews from Roman oppression, nor did he bring about a world of peace and justice envisioned by the prophets. Some Jews are still waiting for the Messiah to come, while others believe that everyone has a role to play in perfecting the world and bringing about the Messianic Age,” Kadden said.

Myself, like over 1.7 billion Muslims don’t believe that Jesus (as) died on a Cross or died at all for that matter. Holy Qur’an claims that the Judeo-Christian stories about the final days of Jesus’ life on Earth, are myths created to serve their religious agenda. Jesus (as) was saved by Allah even before he was to be nailed onto the Cross. Jesus, being a mortal, will return to Earth to die a natural death to prove that he is not part of Allah, the Almighty Creator of this Universe.

Jewish Talmud hates two persons the most; Jesus Christ, his mother Saint Mary. Muslims are very grateful to the G-d of Talmud for not cursing the Prophet of Islam.

Every year during Lent the Jewish-controlled American media broadcast or publish ritual degradation of Christ timed to coincide with Christianity’s holiest season. In 2012, the Jew York Times claimed that Jesus had a wife, based on professor Karen L. King’s (Harvard Divinity School) “Gospel of Jesus’ Wife“, which the newspaper admitted on May 4, 2014 being a forgery.

On March 31, the CBS television network is scheduled to broadcast a two-part, four-hour miniseries The Dovekeepers, which glorifies Jews for rejecting Jesus being a Messiah while blaming Romans for Jesus’ death.

Indian government has even produced a documentary claiming that Jesus lived in Indian occupied Jammu & Kashmir Valley. Watch it below.

Christianity: ‘Jews’ gift to the world’!

JPII+auschwitz+death+wall[1]So says professor David Hillel Gelernter (Yale University) in his latest article, entitled, Why should a Jew care whether Christianity Lives or Dies?, published at Israel’s advocacy magazine First Things on March 24, 2015. Gelernter is also associate editor of Israel’s advocacy magazine The Weekly Standard and former senior fellow at Jewish lobby group, the American Enterprise Institute (AEI).

I argued last month that Pope Francis ought to see the reconversion of Europe (eradication of Muslim immigration) as his most important task. Surely he agrees that European Christianity is in deep trouble. Surely he does not believe that Christianity no longer matters to Europe, or can no longer be compelling to Europeans. How can he ignore a catastrophe on his doorstep?,” Gelernter begins his article.

Israeli Rabbi Baruch Efrati, on the other hand, believes that Islamization of Europe would be good for Jews.

“With the help of G-d, the Gentile (non-Jewish) will adopt a healthier life with a lot of modesty and integrity, and not like the hypocritical Christianity which appears pure but is fundamentally corrupt,”said Rabbi Efrati.

After repeating the usual Zionist myths about Jesus, Crucification, Holocaust, Nazis and the Vatican, Gelernter concludes that Jews have very good reason to worry about what happens to Christianity, because – Jesus is the Christian name for “the Jewish people”.

Jews must acknowledge this truth: Christianity is a dialect of Judaism. It is ours – Jews must own it, proudly,” says Gelernter.

In order to demonize Islam, Gelernter coins a new term, which he calls “Muslim Christianity”, and equates it with the so-called “liberal Christianity” for their common hatred toward the “persecuted Jews”.

The liberal Christianity makes no more sense than Muslim Christianity. As a believing Jew, my grandfather had to break with liberal Judaism towards the end of his life. Conservatism on the other hand is no religion, and has rarely been mistaken for one,” Gelernter writes.

Gelernter also exonerates the Vatican for its alleged collaboration with Nazis, claiming the Nazis hated both Christians and Jews. His claim supports late Toronto chief rabbi, Wolf Gunther Plaut, who in his 1990 book, The Man Who Would Be Messiah, accused Crypto-Jews for committing mass murder of Jews during the 1940s.

Judaism has a message that every last human being needs to hear – but was unsuited to deliver it. Christianity was the chosen vehicle. The whole world has been touched directly either by Christianity (or, yes, Islam, a more remote Jewish dialect) – or by the idea of the modern liberal state. The modern liberal state was invented in America and inspired by the Hebrew Bible – as interpreted every Sunday by Christian preachers, who were influenced in turn by the English state and British philosophy—both developed by Christians, in what was once a deeply Christian nation. Jews and Englishmen loathe each other, unfortunately, but Jewish ideas plus English ideas are iron and carbon, and yield a fabulously strong carbon steel,” says Gelernter.

The annual Status of Global Christianity survey published by the International Bulletin of Missionary Research last month says that Islam has become the world’s top religion (1.7 billion), surpassing Catholicism (1.2 billion).

Jew Academic: Jesus was not Gandhi

I hate to agree with professor Bruce W. Davidson (Hokusei Gakuen – Japanese University based on Christian Zionist theology) on this one.

California-based online daily newspaper American Thinker, founded in 2003 by Thomas Lifson, an Israeli propagandist, published Davidson’s latest crap on March 22, 2015, entitled, Was Jesus a Nonviolent Pacifist?.

Many such people seem to imagine that Jesus was a nonviolent idealist like Gandhi. But anything more than a cursory look at Scripture shows that Jesus was obviously no Gandhi,” Davidson said.

In order to prove his point, Davidson claims that in Matthew 26:52, when Jesus told sword-wielding St. Peter to stop Roman soldiers arresting Jesus: “All who draw the sword will die by the sword,” he was not preaching non-violence like India’s Mahatma Gandhi, but he was condemning the lawless, vengeful people, who will be struck down in all likelihood by the sword of government, meaning the police or the military. I bet while writing about his insight of Judeo-Christian faith – Davidson never thought about his “interpretation of Matthew 26:52 with the so-called “Jewish State”.

Holy Qur’an projects Jesus (as), like all other biblical prophets, as “reformer and enforcer” to establish ‘God’s Kingdom on Earth’.

As an ‘anti-Christ’, I bet Davidson give a damn whether Jesus was ‘nonviolent’ or a ‘terrorist’. Davidson was trying to fool his readers to believe that Jesus never preached violence against non-Christians as prophet of Islam told his followers to use sword to spread his message.

In contrast to Mohammed, Jesus explicitly forbade his disciples to employ the sword to propagate and defend their faith,” Davidson claimed.

I wonder when was the last time Davidson steadied his Old Testament to find out how the so-called Jewish kings David and Solomon killed hundreds of thousands of innocent people for the supremacy of the Israelite Tribes. It was King Solomon who built the first Temple Mount for the rabbis to carryout sacrifice of both humans and animals in it – in order to “purify” the Jews.

It’s useless to expect Davidson to learn Judeo-Christian history from British theologian and author of several books on Judaism, Christianity and Islam – former Catholic Nun Karen Armstrong told Andrea Bistrich of Share International magazine during a September 2007 interview.

There is far more violence in the Bible than in the Qur’an; the idea that Islam impose itself by sword is a western fiction, fabricated during the time of Crusades, when in fact, it were Western Christians who were fighting brutal holy wars against Islam. The Qur’an forbids aggressive warfare and permit war only in self-defense. The moment enemy sues for peace, the Qur’an insists that Muslims must laydown their arms and whatever terms are offered, even if they’re disadvantageous. Later Muslim law (Shari’ah) forbade Muslims to attack a country where Muslims were permitted to practice their faith freely; the killing of civilians was prohibited, as was the destruction of property and use of fire in warfare,” Armstrong said.

In 2006, Uri Avnery, former member of Jewish terrorist Irgun militia and Israeli lawmaker, in an article, Muhammad’s Sword, wrote: “There is no evidence whatsoever of any attempt to impose Islam on the Jews. As is well known, under Muslim rule the Jews of Spain enjoyed a bloom the like of which the Jews did not enjoy anywhere else until almost our time. Poets like Yehuda Halevy wrote in Arabic, as did the great Maimonides. In Muslim Spain, Jews were ministers, poets, scientists. In Muslim Toledo, Christian, Jewish and Muslim scholars worked together and translated the ancient Greek philosophical and scientific texts. That was, indeed, the Golden Age. How would this have been possible, had the Prophet decreed the “spreading of the faith by the sword”?

It’s the same above Islamic laws (Shari’ah), on which both Imam Khomeini and Ayatullah Ali Khamenei have based their Fatwa (religious decree) against Iran’s acquiring a nuclear bomb.

I know prophet Jesus (as) was not a Jew. Furthermore, the New Testament has quoted Jesus cursing the rabbis over 100 times. Mahatma Gandhi, too, disagreed with the Organized Jewry. On November 26, 1938, he penned an article for The Harijan magazine, entitled, The Jews in Palestine.

“The cry for the national home for the Jews does not make much appeal to me. The sanction for it is sought in the Bible and the tenacity with which the Jews have hankered after return to Palestine. Why should they not, like other peoples of the earth, make that country their home where they are born and where they earn their livelihood? Palestine belongs to the Arabs in the same sense that England belongs to the English or France to the French. It is wrong and inhuman to impose the Jews on the Arabs. What is going on in Palestine today cannot be justified by any moral code of conduct. The mandates have no sanction but that of the last war. Surely it would be a crime against humanity to reduce the proud Arabs so that Palestine can be restored to the Jews partly or wholly as their national home. The nobler course would be to insist on a just treatment of the Jews wherever they are born and bred. The Jews born in France are French in precisely the same sense that Christians born in France are French,” Gandhi wrote.

Does that makes Gandhi ‘antisemite’? Not at all. According to Gandhi’s  American Jew biographer, Joseph Lelyveld, who claims that Gandhi had love-affair with a Jew bodybuilder Dr. Hermann Kallenbach, while Gandhi was living in Apartheid South Africa.

‘Swastika’ NO – ‘Cross’ YES!

zionism[1]In order to bring more Christ’s sheep to support the Zionist entity – Jewish professor Bernard Starr (City University of New York, Brooklyn College) has been waging his Zionist-jihad for decades to convince Christians that Jesus was “Jewish” and Jews had nothing to do with nailing Jesus on the Cross. Romans did it and blaming Jews for collaborating with Roman in that heinous crime is anti-Semitism.

In case you believe that Popes Francis or Benedict XVI or John Paul II, represented the original dogma of the Catholic Church, then you got to agree with Starr. All three of them were pro-Israel and said that Jews didn’t kill Jesus. But, then there were no Jews during Jesus’ lifetime, according to Israeli historian Shlomo Sand. They’re called “Israelite” or “Hebrew speaking people”.

Christians who never bothered to read their New Testament or Christian history from some objective source – I would recommend Jewish historian Benjamin H. Freedman’s book Common Sense in which he claims that Jesus was NOT a Jew.

This BIG LIE technique is brainwashing United States Christians into believing that Jesus Christ was “King of Jews”, in the sense that so-called today ‘Jews’ called themselves ‘Jews’. This reference was first made in English translations of the Old and New Testaments, centuries before the Jews hijacked the word ‘Jew’ in the 18th century AD to palm themselves off on the Christian world of having a kinship with Jesus Christ. This alleged kinship comes from myth of their common ancestry with the so-called ‘Jews’ of the Holy Land in the Old Testament history, a fiction based on fable,” Freedman said.

American priest Rev. Ted Pike believes that Jews did kill Jesus but the present-day Jews shouldn’t be blamed for the crimes of their ancestors just like the present-day Christians shouldn’t be blamed for the Crusaders who killed millions of Muslims in the Holy Land and Spain in the past.

We all know how the organized Jewry made Mel Gibson ‘Hitler’ for producing movie, The Passion of Christ, based on Christian Scriptures.

Alex Kronemer, an American Muslim writer, who was born to a Jewish father and Christian mother, watched The Passion of Christ and called it a corrupted version of Jesus’ life and message.

In his latest article, Bernard Starr, spilled his Zionist hatred against other cultures which refuse to take dictation from his Tribe. He claims that the ‘Cross’ was not an evil symbol until Romans applied it in the execution of Christ, but with the passage of time it has lost its ‘evilness’.

It wasn’t until the fourth century that the cross first became a Christian symbol. Legend says that the night before the Eastern Roman Emperor Constantine was preparing to go to war with the Western Emperor, Maxentius, he had a vision of a cross in the sky with the words “by this symbol you will conquer.” Interpreting this as prophesy, Constantine placed the cross on his military banners and shields. After his victory, the sign of the cross began its role as a devotional religious object, eventually becoming one of the most revered symbols in Christianity. The cross became so closely identified with Christianity that by the late Middle Ages and Renaissance, when artworks inspired by Christianity proliferated, the original terrifying meaning was lost. Christianity was able to transform a negative symbol into one of victory and conquest–Jesus’ conquest of death and Christianity’s victory over Rome,” Starr wrote.

Starr, on the other hand, show the usual Zionist double standard when ‘forgiving Swastika’ which appeared on the uniforms of 150,000 German Jewish soldiers.

Four hundred years or more from now, could the narrative be changed? Could the swastika become a symbol of victory over persecution and genocide? It seems unimaginable. But perhaps someone might dare to propose a new rationale, to declare: “The ancient Egyptians, Assyrians, Babylonians, Persians, Greeks, Romans, and the Third Reich are gone. Jews are still here. If Moses embarked from a plane in Tel Aviv he would be greeted in his familiar language (sic) in the Promised Land,” Starr said.

In 2014 documentary, Reclaiming the Swastika, producer Mukti Jain Campion said that the Holocaust industry has demonized the ancient Swastika, which symbolizes ‘love and prosperity’ not only in Hindu religion but had existed in other ancient cultures in Asia and Africa.


Paul Eisen: Judaism is NOT religion of peace

Crime20against20humanity20by20Tsaha[2]Anti-Islam Judeo-Christian writers and Israel Hasbbra (propaganda) professionals have been trying for decades to prove that Islam is NOT religion of peace. However, Canadian Jewish journalist, author and blogger, Eric Walberg, claims that Islam INDEED is road to peace.

Last year, British Jewish writer, blogger and political activist, Paul Eisen, in an interview said: “Judaism is NOT a religion of peace? Christianity and Islam are indeed religions of peace – in their official ideology that is, though by no means always in practice – but Judaism doesn’t even make such a claim. You only have to look at our religious texts to know that.”

Paul Eisen points out ancient Jewish notions of “innocence, victimization, militarism and triumphalism” being the only way to survive in the world filled with Jew-haters.

Irony of ironies, the Israelis aren’t all that wrong because a lot of these delusions are self-fulfilling. Israelis are living on stolen land and have behaved disgracefully, not only to the Palestinians and entire Arab and Muslim world but also to the whole world. Deep down, they must know this and they’d have to be pretty dumb not to realise that nobody much likes them. They’d also have to be pretty stupid not to realise that, at the end of the day, there aren’t that many Israelis or Jews and if the world really got together it would make pretty short work of the famed IDF. No wonder they’re paranoid,” Eisen said.

German Jewish philosopher Dr. Yeshayahu Leibowitz is quoted as saying :”The Jewish religion died 200 years ago. Now there is nothing that unifies the Jews around the world apart from the Holocaust.” In fact Holocaust provides all those ancient notions of “suffering, empowerment, innocence, redemption and specialness.

Israeli-born British writer, author, jazz-player and human-rights activist Gilad Atzmon said in 2010: “If you want to grasp what underlies the Israeli deadly barbarism all you have to do is open the Old Testament. Though it is certain that there is no ethnic or racial continuum between the Biblical Israelites and the Khazarians who lead the Jewish state and its army, the similarities between the murderous enthusiasm described in Deuteronomy and the current string of Israeli lethal actions cannot be denied. Israel is a murderous society not because of any biological or racial lineage with its imaginary ‘forefathers’. Israel is deadly because it is driven by a fanatical tribal Jewish ideology and fueled by a psychotic merciless Biblical poisonous enthusiasm.” Read the rest here.

William Hanna, an American writer, author and blogger discusses some of “Jewish notions” which played central role, from the assassination of JFK to Charlie Hebdo Israel’s false flag operations. Hanna says that the only way to find out the evildoers behind an international tragedy, is to find out who benefits the most from it. Below are some of Hanna’s deductions:

1. JFK’s assassination served the dual purpose of eliminating not only the threat to Israel’s nuclear ambitions, but also the need for the tax-exempt American Zionist Council (AZC ) to register as a foreign agent.

2. The 9/11 was part of Israeli agenda to destabilize entire Arab world and break them down to further smaller and weaker states.

3. The attack in Paris on the editorial offices of the so-called satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo — for whom stoking Islamophobia has proven to be a financially viable business proposition — have been a Mossad operation designed to stem the growing tide of support and sympathy among people in France and other European countries for the Palestinian aspiration of achieving independence and statehood? Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had after all previously warned that “recognition of a Palestinian state by France would be a grave mistake.” Such a hypothesis is by no means far fetched when carefully considering the events as reported by the Jewish-controlled mainstream media.

By staging the Paris attacks, Israel’s Mossad’s would have helped to further reinforce not only the image of the Muslims as a terrorists who are opposed to civilised Western values such as freedom of expression, but also the perception of their being incapable of coexisting harmoniously within Western societies. Such reenforcement by Israel would drive a wedge between the the Western citizen majorities and the Muslim minorities by dissuading Western governments and citizens from adhering to their newly discovered humanity of regarding Palestinians as the victims rather than the aggressors as had been portrayed for decades by the Israeli elite and the Zionist controlled mainstream media. Despite the inducement by Zionism of rampant Islamophobia in the United States, most American citizens are actually in far more danger of being shot and killed by their own “to protect and to serve” racist police forces than they are by militant Islamic terrorists.

Pope Francis: Transgenders are like ‘nuclear weapons’

Francis, the kosher Pope has crossed the ‘Red Line’ this time. He has attacked Israeli/Jewish values by equating transgender people to ‘nuclear weapons’.

My guess is, Francis may have read Samuel Roth’s 1934 book, Jews Must Live that said: Our major vice of old, as of today, is parasitism. We are people of vultures living on the labor and good nature of the rest of the world.

Two Italian authors, Andrea Tornielli and Giacomo Galeazzi, in their just released book,  Pope Francis: This Economy Kills, have quoted an interview with Pope Francis taken in October 2014, in which Francis strongly criticized the Gender Theory, comparing it to nuclear arms.

Let’s think of the nuclear arms, of the possibility to annihilate in a few instants a very high number of human beings. Let’s think also of genetic manipulation, of the manipulation of life, or of the gender theory, that does not recognize the order of creation. With this attitude, man commits a new sin, that against God the Creator. The true custody of creation does not have anything to do with the ideologies that consider man like an accident, like a problem to eliminate. God has placed man and woman and the summit of creation and has entrusted them with the earth. The design of the Creator is written in nature, Francis is quoted saying in the book.

The Jewish media, as expected, didn’t take Francis anti-LGBT rant sitting down. On February 20, Candida Moss at The Daily Beast blasted Francis for challenging the ‘gender theory’ under provocative headline, Pope’s Shocking Hitler Youth Comparison.

Professor Judith Butler (University of California, Berkeley), an American Jewish philosopher, is considered one of the leading theorists in the fields of feminism and queer theory. Butler offers the idea that gender is constructed by society. In other words, she believes that gender—the concept of a female identity or a male identity—is formed by society rather than inherent to an individual. What it means to be a woman or a man, in Butler’s view, depends on a number of systemic and systematic features of larger society. What we get, then, are gender “norms”- the behaviors, practices, and other signals that constitute what is normal for a given gender category. Sexual practices would be among these norms, according to Butler. She considers heterosexual practices a norm. Since Butler does not see anything inherent in gender, she suggests that gender is a kind of performance. People perform their “womanness” or “manness” through behavior, modes of dress, activities, and so forth. Essentially, we act out our gender identity in the way that we might perform a role in a play.

Judith Butler is a lesbian. Her living-partner Jewish Wendy Brown, is a political scientist. Butler has received Awards from both Germany and France for her work on the ‘gender theory’.