Foxman: US must attack Iran to regain world leadership

IranFlag03[1]

Abraham Foxman, top Israeli propagandist and head of Anti-Defamation League (ADL), in an Op-Ed, published by CNN on September 12, 2013, urged Obama administration to strike Iran in case the US wants to regain its credibility and leadership in the world.

It has become conventional wisdom that the roller coaster of American decision-making on the Syria issue has dealt a significant, if not mortal blow, to American credibility and leadership in the world,” says Foxman.

Foxman fears that Obama’s hesitation to take a military action against Syria has conveyed a message to Iranian leadership that America’s “red line” is just a political ploy which would never materialize in a military action.

Foxman, indirectly, claims that Syria has never been a real threat to USrael’s leadership in the region. The title of his aricle says what’s on his evil mind: “It’s Iran, Stupid – how to guarantee US credibility remains after Syria crisis“.

Foxman, agrees with Netanyahu that Iran’s president Hassan Rouhani is not enough “moderate” to take USrael’s dictation on country’s nuclear program. He also claims that a nuclear Iran not only pose a threat to Israel, which has 400 of its own nuclear bombs – but to American client states, such as, Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates.

In the end, the Jewish spin-doctor propose his prescription, saying: “Iran is the real opportunity to make things right once again. Iran is where American strength and leadership are crucial.”

Leaving USrael-Iran issue to West’s “moderate” Rouhani, let’s talk about the 800 Pound Guerilla behind the bloodshed in Syria.

Argentinian writer and author, Adrian Salbuchi says “Israel is behind all wars in the Middle East.

Salbuchi says America had lost its credibility long before Libyan or Syrian crisis when Dubya Bush lied about September 11, 2001 and Saddam Hussein. America’s credibility took a sharp fall when Bush admitted that there was no connection between Saddam Hussein and Osama Bin Laden and later US occupation forces found NO WMDs – and by now we all know that 9/11 was an Israeli false flag operation.

America’s dirty tricks department is raving full-blast right now trying to pin recent chemical weapons attacks on Bashar al-Assad’s government, but this is getting very low credibility ratings.  Common sense dictates that it would be suicide for President Bashar Assad to kill his own civilians – including children – in a Damascus neighborhood, when his real enemies are the Western-backed terrorists and delinquents trying to take over his country,” says Salbuchi.

Saluchi continues as follows:

Ever since the two Gulf wars, America has been fighting Israelis’ wars for them.  In the case of the 2003 invasion and destruction of Iraq, this was so obvious that the very same NeoCons who in 1996-7 planned war against Iraq in their “Project for a New American Century (PNAC)” think-tank – Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, Dick Cheney, Condoleezza Rice, Bush, Douglas Feith, David Wormser and others – would later execute that war in 2003 as top officers in the George W. Bush regime.  The prime reason: Saddam Hussein was then the greatest threat to “democratic and favored ally” Israel.

Several of those NeoCons – Douglas Feith, David Wormser, Richard Perle and other Bushites – had already gone so far as to prepare a strategy report for Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu in 1996 called “A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm” which, again, targeted Iraq as Israel’s key foe at the time.

So, the Iraq War was to a great extent a proxy war that only benefitted Israel, becoming a huge headache for America, which lost thousands of its sons.

As the former prime minister of Malaysia, Mahathir Bin Mohammed, once famously pointed out: “The Jews rule the world by proxy. They get others to fight and die for them.”

The excessive and overpowering role that Zionism plays in American politics, American finance, American universities, American mainstream media including it Hollywood “entertainment industry,” and over American foreign policy, has been all but proven. This vital issue today lies at the heart of an increasingly far-reaching debate among America’s intelligentsia, which is, of course, being hushed up by the mainstream media.

President Barack Obama’s problem right now is that America’s military establishment is very much aware of the stakes involved in any “preventive attack” against Syria and, much more importantly, against Iran.  Intervention against either or both countries will undoubtedly lead to massive war in the Middle East.

But here comes the problem: ever since Israel was kicked out of Southern Lebanon in July 2006 by the well-armed and trained (by Iran and Russia) forces of Hezbollah commanded by Nasrallah, Israel has been licking its wounds; dark furor and revenge burns in Zionism’s heart.

Since Bibi Netanyahu came back to power in 2011, Israel has gone into preventive war mode, using Iran’s inexistent nuclear program as a pretext.  For that past four or five years, Israel has been threatening Iran with military attack almost every other day, with Washington, London and Paris nervously obliging.

The ongoing US military strategy says that if the White House must take on Iran, it should first take out Syria.  At least that seems to be America’s promise of sorts to keep Netanyahu’s dogs of war at bay.

If the road to Tehran must go through Damascus, then, America: take out Damascus now!

About these ads

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s