Tony Blair, the former Zionist Prime Minister of Britain in a recent BBC interview said that the western colonial powers are occupying or supporting the occupations in Afghanistan, Iraq, Chechnya, Palestine, Kashmir, Philippines, Bosnia, Kosova, etc. is because they want to save the world from “radical Islam”.
Naturally, the bigot western Zionist leaders don’t believe that imposing a European Atheist Jews’ illegal entity in the name of Judaism on once Muslim-majority Palestine or Rabbi Oveda Yosef’s, leader of Israel’s Shas Party, call for the mass-murder of Muslim and Christian Palestinians, as ‘Radical Judaism’ – nor Anne Coulter’s call for “invasion of Muslim lands, killing their leaders and converting them to Christianity” or the anti-Islam filth preached by Israeli puppets like John Hagee, Pat Robertson, Jerry Falwell, Franklin Graham and Ron Parsley, as “Radical Christianity”.
Resistance to a foreign occupation is allowed by every major religion and under all international laws. The oppressed ones have the right to wage resistance by every possible mean including the military resistance. In reality, an occupation of a foreign country cannot be achieved without ‘state terrorism’.
Professor John Esposito wrote on August 4, 2010 – that thanks to these Judo-Christian facists:”Muslims and Islam don’t have equal rights in the US.
The teachings of earlier prophets Moses, Joseph and Christ were radical in every sense. They taught to rebel against the existing corrupt and pagan orders. Islam being the last of the three Abrahamic religions, also carry the same messages – fight against all kind of oppressions, establish freedom of faith and equal human-rights for all, irrespective of color, nationality and religion. To the Zionists who are raised on racism and terrorism – such message is “Radical” because they expect their victims to follow ‘peaceful resistance’, or in other words, a total submission to the oppressors.
The term “radical” has been applied to many people, who were considered threat to western colonization, such as Nelson Mandela, Rev. Martin Luther King and Malcolm X, Sayyid Qutb, Dr. Ali Shari’ati (the Shia Qutb), Sayyid Maududi, Imam Khomeini, and others. However, now this term is being associated with any Muslim who dare to criticize foreign powers occupying tradionally Muslim lands espectially the Zionist regime in Jewish occupied Palestine.
In April 2010 – the Jew historian Will Newman clarified some of the mist surrounding Zionists’ fear of ‘Radical Islam’ – because the great majority of Jews don’t believe in Moses’ Lord, as Lucifer is God of Judaism.
Islam doesn’t divide the Believers into ‘radical’, ‘moderate’, ‘secularist’ or ‘liberals’. However, since the 9/11 the followers of the last three categories have found their heaven in the US and Europe. These ‘Muslims’ are not ignorant of the true teachings of Islam. But since they like to follow their worldly desires, they want to corrupt the faith from within under the disguise of ‘modernity’, ‘domocracy’ and ‘progress’. Most of them are no less bigots than Bernard Lewis, Samuel Huttington or Daniel Pipes.
For them to be American or Canadian or European Muslims, means a radical departure from the norms and traditions that have defined Muslim identity since 610 CE. For them, the glorious Islamic past needs to be destroyed, to live in the present and prepare for the future. This means giving up concepts, practices and even laws that do not suit their vision of a 21st century Islam. Thus, concepts such as Muslim Ummah, spiritual and military jihad – rooted in the vision of Islam, is anachronistic. It’s incompatible with the (Zionist-controlled) modern world, they claim.