Hands Off Islamic Iran!

“If Obama was sincere about helping the people of Iran, he would leave the country in peace, instead of making threats and beating the war drum, a drum he is pounding in the exact same rhythm that Bush played in the march to war with Iraq,” Shamus Cooke, a trade unionist and writer for Workers Action, December 28, 2009.

However, Shamus Cooke doesn’t realize that Barack Obama administration is as much controlled by the Israel Lobby as were US administrations under Bushes, Clinton, Reagan and Lyndon Johnson. His foreign policies are dictated by Tel Aviv and not the poor masses in the US who voted for him for a change. And since the Zionist regime in Tel aviv perceives Islamic regime in Tehran headed by Dr. Ahmadinejad as a threat to Israel’s so-called “invincibility” in the Middle East – Iran automatically becomes a mortal threat to 300 million Americans.

The Zionist standard of good leadership is so pathetic that it’s no longer laughable. For example, the wife of the leader of US$400 million funded “Green Revolution”, Dr. Zahra Rahnavard Mousavi, has been awarded third place among the list of “Top 100 Global Thinkers”, by the pro-Israel Think Tank, ‘Foreign Policy Journal (FP)’, established by the Islamophobe author of ‘The Clash of Civilizations’, Samuel Huntington. The top slot goes to Ben Bernanke, Chairman of Federal Reserve while No.2 is Barack Obama. The company Zahra shares – shows where the Zionist Mafia think her and her husband Mir Mousavi’s loyalties are. Ironically, it’s the same Zahra Rahnavard who during her husband’s prime-ministership in the 1980s was called a terrorist by the pro-Israel mainstream media.

The other recent joke is the AFP and AP Zionist propaganda reporting on the funeral procession of  the physic professor at Tehran University, whose assassination looked more like a Mossad-CIA false-flag operation. Both pro-Israel media outlets give very different version of the same event, proving that one must be the work of some  Zionist intelligence to discredit Iranian government. Which means that western media’s  depiction of an event in the Muslim world cannot be trusted entirely. Interestingly, the slain professor Ali Mohammadi was not even associated with Iran’s nuclear program. While Obama and other ZOG leaders of France and Germany are never tired of lying about Iranian nuclear program – US Defence Department’s Intelligence Chief, Lt. Gen. Ronald Burgess was reported by VOA this week that the 2007 findings of National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) still hold true, “We have not seen indication that the government (Iran) has made the decision to move ahead with the program (for military use).”

According to Jewish Wall Street Journal – Obama has woken from the Zionist-cooked fairy-tale about the regime-change in Iran. He now realizes that the ‘Green Revolution’ against Islamic regime in Tehran – which planned and bet-on by him has fizzled out. The irony of the situation in Iran is that no one in opposition movement, lead by Mousavi is asking for the US help against Ahmadinejad’s government. All of them are afraid of Iranians bitter memories of the US and Israeli support for the Reza Shah Pahlavi before his overthrow in 1979 as result mass protests in favor of Imam Khomeini. The paper, however, says that Obama is determined to re-energize the already extinct “official” opposition. He hopes that by financially targeting the current regime in Tehran – through more sanctions and bank account freezes – that the US-friendly Iranian opposition will strengthened, while toppling Ahmadinejad regime. However, the independent analyst familiar with Iran believe Obama’s plan is going to backfire – as more and more Iranian nationalists will join the government as result of ‘crippling sanctions’ or an attack by the USrael.

Iranian masses know that the current political turmoil has nothing to do with the ‘Conservatives’ and ‘Reformists’. In reality, it is a clash between the upper and the middle classes (Bazaris) lead by Mousavi and the majority lower-middle class and poor lead by Ahmadinejad. The westernized upper-class is upset as Ahmadinejad has been spending most of the treasury on the ‘have-not’ majority, which has resulted in inflation to some degree.

Indian author, Dilip Hiro, in his latest article, titled Regime Change in Tehran? Do Not Bet On It … Yet, wrote:

“So far the opposition has been lead by the defeated candidates for the presidency – Mir Hussein Mousavi and Mahdi Karroubi – neither of whom has anything like the charisma or a religious standing of Imam Khomeini…… Both Mousavi and Karroubi want to reform the ciurrent system and not overthrow it.” The most popular slogan of the protestors, according to the western press is “Death to the Dictator”, meaning the Supreme Leader, Ayatullah Khameini – but Dilip Hiro says: “That is certainly not what Mousavi or Karroubi wants”.

“If this interpretation of the current situation in Iran has focused solely on internal political dynamics, that doesn’t mean external forces are unimportant. Given the geo-strategic significance of Iran in the region and the world, any move by not-too-friendly Western governments against Tehran is bound to alter the domestic situation dramatically. Were the Western powers, for instance, to succeed in ratcheting up economic sanctions against Tehran through the United Nations Security Council, the opposition would undoubtedly cease its protests and cooperate with the Ahmadinejad administration to face a common national threat under the banner of patriotism. With a proud recorded history stretching back six millennia, Iranians have evolved into staunch nationalists in modern times. That is a simple, if overarching, fact which leaders in the West cannot afford to ignore,” wrote Dilip Hiro.

I would like to conclude this post by quoting a Christian American patriot on Dr. Ahmadinejad: “I don’t know how many times I have said to my friends – and they can verify it – I wish we had a president as decent as Mahmoud Ahmadinrjad, the current and outspoken president of Iran,” John Kaminiski in The beautiful Iranians.