American mass-media has reported that Hilary Clinton is expected to announce Obama administration’s new strategy on Sudan on Monday – from bullying to dialogues with the Islamist government in Khartoum. It’s another turn-around from the man who during his election campaign promised “tough” actions against Islamic regimes in Tehran and Khartoum to the applause of the Jewish Lobby, which played the role of the midwife for the ‘Save Darfur’ movement.
Responding to the news, Sudanese government spokesperson, Dr. Kamal Obeid said that any action or relation that comes in favour of the Sudanese people’s will be dealt with accordingly. Observers see that the American new policy might be balanced toward Sudan.
In an article, titled Israeli Role in the Darfur Incidents published in Sudan Vision Daily on September 22, said: “African continent was considered by Theodor Hertzel as a geographic and geo-strategic extension for Israel. He was hoping that the eastern part of this black continent would be the target for a second wave of Jewish colonist settlement. On the other hand, Ben Gurion used to consider it a corner stone in Israel plans at encircling the hostile Arab region by a wide zone of friendship and alliance relations that connect Israel with some of the countries bordering the Arab neighbors of Israel. This geo-strategy becomes more significant in being one of the sides of the alliance triangle that include Israel and Ethiopia to form a front that is parallel to the northern front formed by Israel and each of the secular Turkey and the “Shahenshahi” Iran (pre-1979)……. The establishment of Islamic government in Khartuom disturbed those responsible in Tel Aviv and they suffered the nightmare of a Sudanese Iranian Alliance under two Islamic regimes. This was quite a threat against all Israeli plans and arrangements aiming at safeguarding the “Hebrew State” regional security northwards as well as southwards. It also threatened to abort all attempts and projects aiming at enhancing Israeli presence in the Nile Basin and Black Africa in general…..”
Sudanese President Omar Hassan Al-Bashir, who is sought by the International Criminal Court (ICC) for the Israeli trumped-up so-called “war crimes in Darfur” – is due to visit Uganda next week on invitation from Ugadan Presiden Yoweri Musievini to attend a special African Union (AU) meeting on refugees. Zionist lobby groups at ICC and Amnesty International have asked Kampala (a signatory to ICC’s Rome Statute) to arrest Al-Bashir if he land on Ugandan soil. Musievini have laughed at this stupid Zionists’ suggestion. I wonder how many of these Islamophobes would have the courage to admit that Darfur SLM maintains an office in Israel since early 2008 (reported by pro-Israel Sudan Tribune on March 7, 2008).
American author, Mahmood Mamdani in his research book Saviors and Survivors, documents the history of the tribal conflicts in Africa’s largest country (Muslims 70%, Christians 5%, and 25% indigenous beliefs). The author explains the British colonial rulers’ division of Darfur on tribal basis as the root cause of the current problem – which later gave rise to the civil war (1987-89) between nomadic tribes over fertile land in the south; foreign countries (Russia, the US, France, and Israel) meddling in the region and Israel’s fear of the emergence of a pro-Palestinian Islamic state in Africa, which it consider its playground for controlling Islamic resistance in several Muslim-majority African countries, such as Somalia.
In 2007 Bruce Dixon wrote that all the genocide hype against Khartuom regime is for the oil and Israel (just like invasion of Iraq and now propaganda war against Tehran). The ‘Save Darfur’ was created in 2005 by two Jewish organizations – the American Jewish World Service and the US Holocaust Memorial. The ‘Save Darfur’ is infested with Zionist Jew and Christian individuals and groups, who using the organization as PR front for propagating Israeli interests in the US and Africa.
